Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:radio:topics:arduino:30m_phasing_rx [22/07/26 11:35 BST] – [Updates] john | public:radio:topics:arduino:30m_phasing_rx [28/07/26 14:23 BST] (current) – [Mute clicks & thumps] john | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I recently found an old project that had been left in the junk box unfinished. It's a direct-conversion phasing receiver for 30m. | I recently found an old project that had been left in the junk box unfinished. It's a direct-conversion phasing receiver for 30m. | ||
| - | Inspired by my current binge-listen to the Soldesmoke | + | Inspired by my current binge-listen to the Soldersmoke |
| I repaired a few broken wires and dry joints and the RX is working. I've checked that the phasing opposite-sideband rejection is working and given it a tweak to check that the adjustments are doing the right things. All looks good. | I repaired a few broken wires and dry joints and the RX is working. I've checked that the phasing opposite-sideband rejection is working and given it a tweak to check that the adjustments are doing the right things. All looks good. | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| ===== Updates ===== | ===== Updates ===== | ||
| - | After using it alongside my separate 30m TX [[30m_cw_tx|]] | + | After using it alongside my separate 30m TX while testing the TX I found it **very** necessary to turn the volume down **FULLY** before transmitting, |
| I added a simple audio switch in series with the audio path, between between the post-BPF amplifier stage and the " | I added a simple audio switch in series with the audio path, between between the post-BPF amplifier stage and the " | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| It works well enough to both save my hearing and to provide a useful sidetone from the receiver during transmit, which means I don't need to add a sidetone circuit. | It works well enough to both save my hearing and to provide a useful sidetone from the receiver during transmit, which means I don't need to add a sidetone circuit. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| + | |||
| + | ==== Mute clicks & thumps ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I found this arrangement of using diodes to " | ||
| + | |||
| + | I noticed a loud click/thump as the first CW character was sent and the mute operated. Initially I assumed that the MUTE wasn't operating soon enough, or that the QSK wasn't delaying the SI5351 VFO enable line sufficiently long enough to allow the MUTE (and C/O relay) switching. Much probing with the 2-channel scope shows that the relative timing is okay. The loud initial click occurs whenever the first loud audio feeds into the mute circuit, regardless of how long the mute has been active, and how long the RF is delayed. I played with the Arduino code to delay the RF enable so that the RF didn't come on until 100mS after the MUTE and Relay c/o - enough to miss several morse characters - and yet still there was a loud click when the first loud audio arrived. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I tried pulling the MUTE line down to ground with a croc-clip-lead - and this cured the problem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looking at the MUTE line on a scope shows that it normally only goes down to about 1V when the transistor switches, not 0V and this leads to an initial loud click when the first loud audio arrives on first key-down. Once the click is gone the mute behaves correctly, but it appears that unless the MUTE line is hard-down it doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sharing the MUTE line via a single transistor switch and steering diodes was the problem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The cure was to use a separate 2N3904 transistor to pull the MUTE line down hard without a diode inline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now the MUTE operates correctly, and smoothly and the faint leak-through is enough to act as a simple sidetone. And no loud CLICK on key down. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== RX Bandpass Filter ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Initially I installed a simple 2-stage Op Amp BPF. It was designed several years ago and I don't know what my though process was at the time - what Q and Gain I was aiming for. It's not //bad// but it's not as good as I would like it to be. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had a look at the component values and reverse engineered the design. | ||
| + | |||
| + | With R1 = 47k, R2 = 6k8, R3 = 68k and the capacitors 10n it seems that the design Q was only 1.7 and the gain 0.7 and center frequency 800Hz . With two identical stages this would mean a designed overall gain of about 0.5. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm sure it could/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | I redesigned for Q = 4 & Gain = 1.1 and Frequency = 700Hz, keeping the 10n capacitors | ||
| + | |||
| + | * R1 = 82k | ||
| + | * R2 = 2k7 | ||
| + | * R3 = 180k | ||
| + | |||
| + | I breadboarded this to test and it gives a Q and gain just less that 1 with much better shape and attenuation of HF signals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then re-designed again for Q = 5 and got FIXME from memory | ||
| + | |||
| + | * R1 = 100k | ||
| + | * R2 = 2k | ||
| + | * R3 = 220k | ||
| + | |||
| + | This was slightly tighter and works nicely on the bench fed from a signal generator, measuring output on a ' | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Further Information ===== | ===== Further Information ===== | ||